Google reportedly made it harder to find Android privacy setting
Google reportedly made it harder to find Android privacy settings and even pressured phone makers into hiding settings.
Google reportedly made it harder to find Android privacy settings and even pressured phone makers into hiding settings.
The Court of Appeal’s conclusion that the ‘Immigration Exemption’ in Schedule 2 to the DPA 2018 is not compliant with the GDPR creates two data protection headaches for Government.
Europe’s top human rights court ruled that British mass surveillance and intelligence-gathering practices breached human rights laws.
WhatsApp has filed a lawsuit in Delhi against the Indian government seeking to block regulations coming into force.
Appeal court ruling means people denied settled status or immigration visas can see records used in the case.
The landmark decision, while powerful in declaring that UK mass interception powers are unlawful, imprudently bought into spy agency propaganda that suspicionless interception powers must be granted to ensure national security.
In a win for privacy, the Court of Justice of São Paulo blocks facial recognition on a public transport route.
The company lost a bid to block a EU privacy decision that could suspend its ability to send information about Europeans to the U.S.
Specifically, the issue was whether or to what extent Art. 15 GDPR grants a right to receive copies of e-mails.
Legal action against Google over claims it secretly tracked millions of iPhone users’ would “open the floodgates” to mass data protection claims.
Belgian Constitutional Court annulled the framework set forth by the Law of 29 May 2016 requiring telecommunications providers to retain electronic communications data in bulk.
The Baden-Wuerttemberg Labour Court of Appeals has clarified the requirements for an entitlement to immaterial damages in cases of a violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).