CJEU Clarifies the GDPR’s Right to Compensation
This ruling provides much needed clarity on an individual’s ability to seek legal recourse for violations of their data privacy rights.
This ruling provides much needed clarity on an individual’s ability to seek legal recourse for violations of their data privacy rights.
The Dutch consumer rights groups are fighting Google to cease their collection and sale of users’ data without their express consent.
Advocate General released an opinion on the concepts of “controller”, “joint controller” and “processor”, and also liability system established by the GDPR.
With this decision CJEU clarifies the right to obtain a copy of personal data provided by article 15 of GDPR.
The Advocate General delivered opinion concerning the conditions regarding fines under the GDPR.
Meta has lodged two applications with the CJEU requesting annulment of the Binding Decisions issued by the EDPB.
Whilst Member States have discretion over whether they adopt specified rules, such rules must prioritize protecting employees’ fundamental rights to privacy.
EU Court emphasized that the transmission of pseudonymized data to a data recipient will not be considered personal data if the recipient cannot re-identify the data subjects.
The AG suggested that GDPR requires companies to provide personal data copies to individuals, regardless of why it was requested.
ECJ released a ruling that clarifies the relationship between the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and national civil procedural regulations.
After seven years the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany put a definitive end to the debate on data retention – ruling it incompatible with EU law.
This string of victories will surely embolden other companies to challenge their own GDPR violations.