EDPB Issues Opinion on Processor and Sub-Processor Obligations Under GDPR
The EDPB’s recent opinion clarifies controllers’ obligations regarding processors and sub-processors under the EU GDPR, emphasizing the need for transparency and compliance.
The EDPB’s recent opinion clarifies controllers’ obligations regarding processors and sub-processors under the EU GDPR, emphasizing the need for transparency and compliance.
Advocate General released an opinion on the concepts of “controller”, “joint controller” and “processor”, and also liability system established by the GDPR.
The guidance addresses question: when can a processor use personal data for purposes broader than just strictly providing services to the controller?
In addition to issuing new (draft) standard contractual clauses for transferring personal data outside of the EEA, on November 12, […]
There is always significant negotiation around caps on liability when negotiating a contract with a technology vendor. If the vendor […]
The Dutch Supervisory Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, “AP”) recently communicated a press release stating that it reached out to 30 organizations […]
When considering the termination of a vendor relationship, you must consider the vendor, the contract and the business impact. Although […]
The EU General Data Protection Regulation has been in effect for five months, and yet there has not been much […]
Lessons can be learned in the financial services sector from the rush to update contracts to account for the General […]
To maintain your compliance, you will have to track your third-party suppliers and how they handle any customer record data […]
Closing data-related deals seemed so much simpler pre-GDPR, didn’t it? Remember the days when every enterprise customer was a controller […]
The use of electronic signatures (e-signatures) can prove that data processing contracts have been concluded and their terms agreed to, […]