Council Approves Regulation to Streamline Cross-Border GDPR Complaints
The Council approved new rules to speed up and harmonize cross-border GDPR complaints, with uniform criteria, clear procedures, and strict investigation deadlines.
The Council approved new rules to speed up and harmonize cross-border GDPR complaints, with uniform criteria, clear procedures, and strict investigation deadlines.
New EU rules set deadlines and streamlined procedures for cross-border GDPR enforcement, strengthen complainant rights, and promote early consensus among national data protection authorities.
Noyb filed GDPR complaints against TikTok, AliExpress, and WeChat for failing to properly respond to European users’ data access requests.
Activists filed complaints against Meta for not respecting users’ requests to opt out of targeted advertising in Europe, prompting investigations by data protection authorities.
Noyb has filed a complaint against TikTok and other Chinese firms for allegedly unlawfully sending EU user data to China, highlighting GDPR violations.
The CJEU ruled that complaint frequency doesn’t invalidate GDPR complaints unless they are clearly vexatious or abusive, impacting data protection enforcement across the EU.
Pinterest faces a GDPR complaint from noyb for allegedly tracking users without consent and failing to respond to data access requests.
Mozilla faces a privacy complaint for allegedly collecting user data in Firefox without consent, raising GDPR compliance concerns.
The case against Sweden’s IMY raises concerns over the enforcement of data protection rights under EU law, prompting noyb to appeal for proper complaint handling.
Noyb has filed complaints against X for using personal data of 60 million EU users for AI training without consent, urging compliance with GDPR regulations.
OpenAI faces GDPR complaints in the EU for ChatGPT’s inaccurate data generation, risking fines and regulatory actions.
KSV1870, a creditors’ association, is accused of profiting from the right of access to personal data under the GDPR by misleading individuals, especially foreigners, into purchasing a high-priced “InfoPass” instead of obtaining a free copy of their data.